sekritomg: (mew mew)
[personal profile] sekritomg
There was some arguing on Tumblr and you know me, I love arguing. It's a long thread, or whatever, so start here and read back. A lot of people there have covered all the points I would make really well, but [livejournal.com profile] formerdinosaur mentioned that she is sick of seeing the conversation about bottoming and characters who are depicted as bottoming. She's right, it's an old discussion that keeps coming back, over and over again. So quickly, I jotted down a few points that came to mind on the topic, some of which are only loosely related:

It’s been done before. I got into this fandom on Christmas Eve 2007. That is six years ago. Six years. Part of me at all times is like, what the fuck, how did this go on for so long? Another part of me is just like, wow, it’s amazing that I’ve been in this fandom for six years and people are still arguing over the same stuff, namely the top-bottom dynamic between Stan and Kyle. I have heard this conversation so many times. It’s not in any sense the fault of people who keep starting this argument that they don’t realize it’s been had before, but it has. It’s good to acknowledge that this fandom has been around for a while and ask around to see what kinds of responses you get. Many of us have been here for a while, watching the same topics get rehashed over and over again. I would be happy to discuss almost anything, and I’m sure most people would be, too.


Just because something is mainstream doesn’t make it bad. It’s perfectly natural to want to make a trope your own by inverting it or to get sick of the mainstream way things seem to be done. But something being pervasive doesn’t make it wrong. Clichés are often cliché because they reflect some amount of truth. I think if Kyle is so frequently written as a bottom, you might ask why it’s so popular. People have before, but I don’t know that there’s any good answer, and that means the conversation remains relevant. Anyway, taste is personal, but something being cliché or well-tread or done-to-death doesn’t make it bad or wrong in and of itself.

Doing something just to be different isn’t worth much. We’re dealing with fan fiction. Moreover, we’re dealing with fiction. Novelty and rebellion can be qualities of excellent and revolutionary fiction, but there are so many other aspects of writing that are arguably more essential to the creation of a good piece of writing. It’s fine to pursue inversions and subversions of perceived tropes, but you’d better have something else going on in your story or it’s going to be pretty boring and unmemorable.

Characterization is subjective. Within reason, I mean, let me come up with something. … Okay, I think it’s pretty clear that Kyle’s parents aren’t crazy homophobes who’d kick him out of the house for being gay, yet I’ve read that a lot. If I see that, I consider it out-of-character. On the other hand, I’m willing to accept that Kyle’s parents have a range of possible reactions to his coming out, because even in real life people are unpredictable, and viewed somewhat differently by everyone they know. On this show we’re dealing with 17 years of sometimes inconsistent ‘canon.’ So maybe you and I see the same traits in Kyle and ascribe different readings to him based on these similar observations.

Gender roles can be restrictive and conforming to them can make us miserable, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. It’s admirable to think that gender roles are bad, but, listen, they’re not always bad. Not on their own. What’s bad is forcing people to conform to your gender expectations, individually or systemically. Gender roles are one tool people have for defining themselves, and so long as people use them as needed, and not as coerced by a patriarchal society, they’re not inherently harmful. Moreover, you can argue that gender roles are bad and forcing people to conform to them is bad, but that doesn’t mean gender roles don’t exist and a character on South Park won’t identify with some kind of gender expression in a fan fiction.

Some gay men are effeminate. You know what, some men conform to whatever harmful stereotypes we collectively have about gay men. Not all gay men! And a lot of the ones who do are not pervasively butch, or effeminate. Most people are an amalgamation of traits. In some senses, playing out extreme gender roles can be a response to or a subversion of restrictive stereotypes. From one standpoint, effeminacy calls into question what defines manliness. It can be viewed in that way as an act of rebellion, as an effeminate gay man can force those who do believe in conforming to strict gender dichotomies to reassess what is male. Quentin Crisp used his effeminacy as armor, as it forced people to confront his difference. (ETA: I had a line here about post-1980s butch aesthetics as a response to AIDS and it disappeared. Hello, where'd it go?) It’s not like the gay community isn’t accutely aware of and in many cases ready to embrace gender roles.

But, look, when you say you are not a fan of gay men in fan fiction conforming to gender roles, you probably mean you are not into reading about femmey men. Some might argue that condemning effeminacy and valuing it to be of lower status than butchness is a kind of sexism, for it sees traditionally female roles as lesser than male ones. This isn’t a new point. People have been making this point in SP fan fic for a long, long time, alongside the people who have been arguing that SP fan fic is sexist and Wendy is devalued by Stan/Kyle shippers who hate her. And that Bebe isn’t a slut. And that Cartman is fat so stop writing and drawing skinny!Cartman. If you are going to make these gripes, consider constructing them around actual evidence from the show and/or fandom so that alongside your passion there is some actual (meta)textual substance to digest. Remember when we called this shit “meta”? Me neither.

In conclusion, fiction tells truths. People write fiction because it’s escapist and amusing, but we also enjoy it for its truths. The fact is that there are some femmey gay men who like to bottom, and that doesn’t make them weak or girly. And even if it does, so what? Weakness isn’t always a fault. To call girliness an inferior quality is to be sexist. I genuinely believe that everyone in this fandom has their heart in the right place, and that we all love these characters and at least tolerate the show. The thing that makes anything in life interesting, but fandom especially, is a multiplicity of readings, ideas, and ways of expressing truths. Some of these truths are universal and some are personal. An author writing a story with bitchy Kyle wanting to bottom and having some femmey traits is what some of us want to read because it reflects some aspect of how we see Kyle and how we value ourselves in relation to gender roles. There are also a number of fics where Stan bottoms, and while I don’t really see him that way it doesn’t mean there’s no value in that presentation. It’s just something different.

In fandom, the best way to get what you want is to write it yourself. This advice is cliché, but it’s cliché because it’s true. If you write enough of it or you write it well enough or you just make friends who want you to be happy and stick around, others will follow. If you’re frustrated that no one’s writing enough of what you want to see, the best way to start a conversation about it is to openly ask why. None of this is new or groundbreaking, but that doesn’t make it any less legitimate.

Date: 2013-12-17 21:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_confunded_/
Yeah, reading this I can see some problematic parts of my response to those posts. I kind of (definitely) lashed out in anger, so looking back on it now there were a lot of things I could have said better. Namely that I didn't mention anywhere that it's okay for a character to be weak (whether emotionally, physically, etc) or be in a weak place at any point in time, because that's realistic, everyone has weak moments, and Kyle certainly does! That's another reason why I hate the "but Kyle's a strong character!" argument, because yeah, he is, but not ALWAYS. And the "but Kyle said he likes being a dirty little boy!" argument I also see a lot in these types of posts that implies that you can't bottom and also identify as a man, which is just a fucking awful way of looking at sex dynamics.

And yes, you're absolutely right that a lot of people do conform to gender roles, including gay men, and there's nothing wrong with that, and for some that might actually influence what their preferred sex role is. I can't really speak much for that, as a straight girl. I guess my point against Ukaisha was that she was saying in one post that she wants to do away with gender roles and the yaoi stereotypes and then implying in another post that Kyle can't or shouldn't like bottoming because he's too vocal and strong for it, which really pisses me off. There are absolutely a lot of gay men who are effeminate, or are at least express traits traditionally viewed as "feminine" without feeling emasculated. And in the show Kyle displays a lot of "feminine" traits, because his parents are openminded, and as a result he's capable of showing emotion and isn't ashamed to cry when he needs to. The problem I have with the way some people in fandom react to these traits is that they, particularly people who crusade against bottom Kyle, will see those CANON characteristics in a fic in which he bottoms and say that the writer made him "too girly" or "weak" or "ooc", simply because he bottoms. Then they will renounce "girly Kyle" and react by writing/drawing him as hyper-masculine and the result is that they generally ignore a lot of the traits he has in the show that are more feminine and conform more closely to the seme/uke dynamic than the people they were complaining about to begin with. I see "uke Stan" loads more than I see "uke Kyle", even though everyone is always complaining about "uke Kyle", for example. Maybe I just don't read enough fic, but I don't actually see highly exaggerated, super ukey Kyle that often, and I basically exclusively read bottom Kyle.

I feel like I'm getting off topic. My comments on your posts always end up so long winded and dumb. But, yeah. I liked this post, and I agree with it. I know that this is a topic that will never, ever die, so I always regret perpetuating it by getting involved in discussions about it, haha. The "too strong to bottom" argument just makes me so mad, not just as a fan of Kyle bottoming, but as a woman. It enrages me to no end seeing other women make this connection, consciously or not, that being penetrated equates to having the weaker/passive role in a relationship. Whether they mean to or not, they're saying the bottom is the girl and therefore the bottom needs to be the weaker/passive character out of the two, which is so.... UGH. That's not to say that the bottom can never be passive or submissive or take on a more feminine role in the relationship, but to basically say that as a rule they have to be that way in order to bottom so outspoken characters HAVE to top is just ludicrous and infuriating.

I got into it with Ukaisha quite a few months ago (maybe a year? I forget) about a similar subject, so I guess she's really hung up on this topic. That time she whining about people having dynamic preferences in shipping, and how everyone should like everything and if you don't like to read a character topping then you're wrong. And my response was a really lengthy, convoluted way of saying "no, people can like some things more than others and disliking something is okay". And overall it was a really exhausting exchange, so Ukaisha was already on my list of "people to try to ignore" before this, but she bothers me on a regular basis so when this popped up on my dash I reacted really strongly.

Date: 2013-12-19 18:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] formerdinosaur.livejournal.com
I think what annoys me is not so much that I've seen it in this specific fandom before but just across every fandom, without fail, always presented like some kind of fucking revelation and often more about the poster strutting their specialness than any sincere burning need for Character X to stop taking it up the ass. And it's always more focused on what the "Kyle" character (ie the one who is usually bottoming in fandom) should not be doing than on what he or anybody else should be doing because it would suit their canon characterization more or whatever. It's just such a phony argument to me - the only people I've ever encountered who've made it convincingly are fans who actually make something with Character X topping. Whether I feel it's done convincingly or not, I at least believe that people who bother to make something with their bottoming/topping preferences actually care about the dynamic and don't just want back pats for going against the evil majority. And I suppose making something would include an actual essay-like post about why they prefer their less popular dynamic, though in the hands of most that's just a recipe for 'he's not a woman!'-like statements. Anyway, you're absolutely right -- if you don't see what you want in fandom, make it. That's what fandom is.

Date: 2013-12-22 00:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brimbelle.livejournal.com
In fandom, the best way to get what you want is to write it yourself.
A few weeks ago I saw a post on tumblr where someone asked people what they thought was overdone in the fandom, and someone else reblogged it and made a list of things (I just remember Stan/Kyle) and added "These need to stop" in the end. I think it's sad and quite confusing to think that way, it's obvious that people write/draw what they like and asking them to stop is not going to make them write/draw something they have no interest in.

Date: 2013-12-24 21:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sekrit-omg.livejournal.com
Basically, yeah. I think that S/K is a relatively big pairing, or if it's not that big then at least there seems to be a relatively visible coherent group of people who are into it. So I think maybe it might be that people who aren't into S/K are ... well, not jealous, but somewhat overwhelmed and responding accordingly.

Ultimately I think a lot of the problems with lists of what's wrong in SP fandom result from the person not rationalizing or explaining their view. It's just, I hate S/K, it sucks, they're all Wendy haters. That's fine, you can hate S/K, but if you're going to hate it please follow up with maybe what you don't like about it? That at least gives some content for me to react to.

Mature galleries

Date: 2015-11-25 15:30 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Pornographic girls blog
http://camgirls.adultnet.in/?fill someone in on.summer
man erotic erotic dating services erotic vampire stories angelina jolie erotic

Adult site

Date: 2015-11-26 15:13 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Vulgar girls blog
http://shemales.blogporn.in/?make the most of_ainsley
phun.org ebony free gay suck blowjob movies africa wildlife safari japan woyeur

Unshackle galleries

Date: 2015-11-26 17:02 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
My contemporary folio
best apps downloads best free dating app for android best games android free android 18 sex game google software for android
http://adult.android.market.sexblog.pw/?profile.norma
free movie downloader apk android micromax mobile love dating market apps installer download emoji emoticon

Grown up site

Date: 2015-11-26 18:36 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Started new web predict
phones play about android mobiles video sex wallpaper the cheapest android phone best free mmorpg for android
http://adult.google.play.lastnews.in/?register.kaelyn
free download app games aplicacoes android download gratis top racing games free androids game free download pornhub app

Pictures from community networks

Date: 2015-11-26 22:35 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
New gay place
http://gayarab.erolove.in/?info_jimmy
gay wedding rings jamie foxx gay gay.co.nz gay chatline gay events

Grown up galleries

Date: 2015-11-27 09:09 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Sexy shemales
http://tranny.net.erolove.in/?profile-alejandra
freeshemale vids shemal pict shemle free shmale sex sexuality videos free

My unfamiliar website

Date: 2015-11-27 12:55 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Porn from group networks
http://blacklesbians.xblog.in/?special.bridget
the erotic roman erotic art erotic publishers sex positions

Sexual pictures

Date: 2015-11-27 19:46 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Fascinating girls blog
http://ebony.porndairy.in/?tweet-kiera
erotic short films mobile erotic videos erotic telugu stories erotic oil paintings

Loose galleries

Date: 2015-11-28 08:10 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Porn gay vie with
http://gayarab.erolove.in/?page_rene
gay nz gay relationships gay group sleeping gay german gay

Pictures from social networks

Date: 2015-11-28 10:03 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Shemale pics
http://asianladyboy.erolove.in/?private-elizabeth
shemeal sex movies tgirls transexuals video transexuals sex video transexual chat

My unfamiliar website

Date: 2015-11-28 15:55 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Gay porn website
http://yaoi.erolove.in/?profile.jefferson
straight to gay gay new zealand free online gay chat rooms pro gay marriage gay meeting sites

My brand-new website

Date: 2015-11-28 18:15 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Original work
free app to meet singles fitness apps for android market android apps all apk apps create own android app
http://androidporn.blognet.pw/?diagram.mya
phones play tutorial for android app development adult app downloads mobile android one boobs photo s

Renewed install

Date: 2015-11-28 20:31 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
My revitalized folio
free video player downloader android applications download app para smartphone cheap android phones in india best apps for android download
http://pornmarket.replyme.pw/?mail.mina
free mobile adult cams htc dhd free downloads live wallpaper free call and text app android free apps games

Adult galleries

Date: 2015-11-28 23:32 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Started up to date cobweb throw
mp3 music downloader for android phone best xxx apps android games sexy download app android market free android google contacts
http://androidporn.blognet.pw/?stage.jalyn
best app to download books 9apps download for android tv stream for android android keyboard apps dictionary english free

Free adult galleries

Date: 2015-11-29 10:46 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Gay porn from collective networks
http://gay.adultgalls.com/?page_seamus
gay hotline number gay kisses gay strippers gay mens gay football

Open adult galleries

Date: 2015-11-29 20:31 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Gay porn site
http://gayarab.erolove.in/?page-julian
gay clubs london australian gay gay marriage facts older gay men gay justin bieber

Recent plat

Date: 2015-11-30 15:45 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Erotic ladyboy
http://futanari.blogporn.in/?post-jacey
shemalle shemal sex shmale tgirl shemail

New install

Date: 2015-12-01 02:38 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Gay porn site
http://men.sexblog.pw/?page-randall
gay hotline gay jewish men gay mates gay party gay birthday cards

Full-grown galleries

Date: 2015-12-01 04:57 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Shemale anal sex
http://shemale.replyme.pw/?page-mallory
shemal free movies free shemaleporn.com young shemal pic shemal sex shemalevideo.com

My brand-new website

Date: 2015-12-01 07:37 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Freeware gay porn
http://gayarab.erolove.in/?info_kyle
gay rugby atlantis gay cruise gay christians african gays soulja boy gay

Mature placement

Date: 2015-12-01 18:29 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
My latest pron blog
http://beach.sexblog.pw/?reserved_nadia
free adult sites erotic cars cybersex erotic online novels

Communal pictures

Date: 2015-12-02 11:55 (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Clumsy shemales
http://futanari.blogporn.in/?profile-kennedy
transsex videos pornnos free shemail shemalemovies.com free pornagrafic vidios

June 2025

M T W T F S S
      1
234567 8
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 11:48
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios